Scroll down or click for
Ohio | Florida | California | Nevada | Iowa | South Dakota | New Mexico | Wisconsin
Presidential Election Results, the Exit
Polls vs. the Vote Counts
Comparison: 2000 and 2004 Presidential Election
2004 USA Population Served by Voting Machine Types
The 2004 Ohio
Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis:
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush
Seven-eights of voters in heavily-Democratic Cuyahoga
County, more than one
of every eight
Ohio Kerry voters, could have voted at an adjacent precinct using
the wrong ballot order.
"... I focus on one Presidential
election issue, cross-voting—how votes
cast one way are counted as a vote for a different candidate or option.
I also focus
on Ohio and a particular area with one-tenth of the Ohio vote, Cuyahoga
This article discusses problems with the 2004 Ohio Presidential
and demonstrates how the Cuyahoga County election was inherently unfair
in many Kerry votes going uncounted, counted as third-party votes, or
to Bush votes...."
In a sample of 166,953 votes, one of every 34 Ohio
voters, the Kerry-Bush margin
shifts 6.15% when the population is sorted by
outcomes of wrong-precinct voting.
Continue reading: How Kerry Votes Were Switched to
Bush Votes (updated April 2008)
charts displayed below are samples from the spreadsheets.
Ohio Election Spreadsheets Page
Ohio rates its own page, with numerous
spreadsheets and charts!
Here are just several of those links.
ARTICLE: How Ohio Kerry
Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes
cross-votes count for a specific third-party candidate,
Badnarik votes increase five-fold and Peroutka votes jump over
of the article are now available in a PowerPoint
Only in Florida does % Kerry fail to
correlate with % Democrats.
In Florida, electronic voting correlations do not
match other voting methods.
In Florida, the 2004 Bush increase correlates with the percentage of
Democrats, moreso in
E-Touch counties than in Op-Scan counties. In Op-Scan counties, the
2004 Bush increase
negatively correlates to the percentage of registered Republicans. At
the same time, Bush Increase
has no correlation with Bush votes in E-Touch counties and a strong
correlation in Op-Scan counties.
Various States 2004
In South Dakota, the percentage of non-partisan voters has a strong
with the percentage of Daschle votes only in the counties with paper
The Kerry and Daschle correlations match in paper ballot counties.
In New Mexico, why does the Sequoia and Danther E-voting equipment
fail to count so many votes? On average, 2.62% of voters did not vote
per these machines, compared to 0.46% non-votes in the Op-Scan
United Voters of New Mexico - Statistical Analysis of
What is a Pearson
Wisconsin 2011 Supreme
Click files below to view
by James Q. Jacobs. All Rights Reserved. jqjacobs.net | Contact
All the spreadsheets are Excel files.