NEWS: "...
latitude at Harran equals 3/4 atan and at Ur 3/5 atan ..."
2008.04.25
- When
is a "moon temple" an observatory? Recent press reports called my attention
to
Göbekli Tepe in Turkey (Göbekli
Tepe - An Introduction). A flurry of news and media has followed
the Jan. 18 article in Science, 319:5861.
I particularly enjoyed a blog with good photos and critical attention to interpretation:
My
Visit to Paradise. Location = 37.224 N., 38.922 E.
Since 1994, archaeologist
Klaus Schmidt
has
excavated at the
Göbekli Tepe stone circles,
circles 7,000 years older than Stonehenge.
Schmidt reported, "Gobekli
changes everything. It's elaborate, it's complex, and it is pre-agricultural. That
fact alone makes the site one of the most important archaeological finds in a very
long time." The German Archaeological
Institute
presents information about their
Göbekli Tepe activity
online. I include several videos and the links above for more imagery. The videos,
German televison reports, contributed immensely to visualizing the site. I confess
ignorance of the dialogue or the validity of any interpretaions they present.
None of us, not even
archaeos, needs an excuse for being unfamiliar with
such early Neolithic megalithic monuments; their existence is still big news. Nonetheless,
interpretations about religion and even Adam and Eve have appeared.
In researching the exact location, I read more of the regional archaeological
context, with which I'm also rather unfamiliar. Literally and professionally,
I live in the "New
World,"
the Americas. One interpretation
I encountered online called Harran's inhabitants "Septimite idolators." Okay
then! It was more explicit associations with astromony that caught my attention
with reference to Harran,
an ancient center on the great plain south of
Göbekli Tepe.
Harran is renowned
as a Sabaean center associated with a moon "temple" and
as an earlier Sumerian center. Harran was an important, once-populous
prehistoric crossroad. I noticed Harran's latitude is 36.87 degrees,
the acute angle of a 3:4:5 geodetic triangle (3/4 arc tangent = 36.8699°).
Was knowledge of the latitude considered in locating a moon temple
at Harran? When is a "moon temple" an observatory? When is
idolatry exact science?
At
this point the Old World had captured my attention once again,
distracting from great pueblo geometry near the same latitude. The
history/myth of Mesopotamia holds that Ur and Harran are two important,
related Sumerian centers, both associated with the moon. I checked
the Ur ziggurat, at 30.963 degrees. At first I did not notice colatitude
equals 5/3 arctangent (atan). Colatitude is the distance to the nearest
pole, a geodetic reference point. Latitude references the equator,
the mid-poles plane perpendicular to the rotation axis. The local level
plane at Harran intersects the rotation axis at a 4/3 atan angle, forming
a 3:4:5 right triangle, as does latitude in relation to the equator
and geodetic center.
Summarizing, colatitude at Harran equals
4/3 atan and at Ur 5/3 atan, while latitude at Harran equals 3/4 atan
and at Ur 3/5 atan. Perhaps these "idolators" were
doing astronomy? Lucky me, astronomy is not punishable idolatry anymore.
Getting to why I did not
notice the Ur colatitude right off, I checked latitude first because the
precise value for pi caught my eye in the conversion table. We live in a 360
degree world, probably due to ancient astronomers in this region. Cultures
also invent 365 degree worlds, as known from the history of astronomy in China.
Divide earth's circumference by days per solar orbit (0.98561° =
SO), multiply by 10 pi, and the result is the latitude of the Ur ziggurat,
or 30.9638° = 31.4159 SO. This 10x version of pi caught my eye,
distracting from the latitude tangents. But, I digress with this precise
pi coincidence given a 365.25 degree world.
I turned next back
to Göbekli Tepe
and Harran. The sites are apparently intervisible, just over 40 km
apart. The difference in latitude from Harran to Göbekli Tepe
equals precisely 1/1,000 of earth's circumference. This is where we
enter a twilight zone in ancient astronomy. Of course, the opposite
metaphor is the proper one regarding the inference, "the dawn" of
ancient astronomy. Also, Göbekli Tepe features the oldest known
room aligned north-south.
Even non-archaeos
understand stratification and deposition basics—deeper is older.
Göbekli
Tepe is 12,000 years old. Harran is equated with Abraham of biblical
fame, and with Ur of Sumeria, the "Civilized Land" and
a "cradle of civilization." That cradle and astronomy is presumed to be
4,000 to 5,000 years old, not 12,000. Harran is located at 3/4 atan latitude,
a fixed parameter, and Göbekli
Tepe is at a specific latitude difference north. Because the fixed
parameter must come first, the conundrum, of course, is that this precise
1/1,000 of circumference latitude difference is either coincidence,
or ancient astronomy just took a leap back to 12,000 years ago.
Anyway, that's how
I came to notice the latitudes and colatitudes of Ur and Harran,
excitement enough without entering twilight zones of inference and
interpretation. But if I must, I might argue the Ur and Harran "moon
temples" evidence a
relationship to astronomy and precise knowledge of geodesy. In other
words, what we call exact sciences. Here is one more video of
Göbekli
Tepe, where carved stones speak well enough for themselves and for
their makers 12,000 years ago.
2008.11 - Smithsonsian
Magazine has the good sense to frame same as a question: "Gobekli
Tepe: The World's First Temple? Turkey's stunning Gobekli Tepe
upends the conventional view of the rise of civilization," by
Andrew Curry with photographs by Berthold Steinhilber.
2009.08 - examiner.com repeats
the temple interpretaton in Göbekli
Tepe: Standing stones from humanity's oldest temple by Gwynneth
Anderson. They are engineers when building, "
Building such a site is an engineering challenge...." Then when preserving
the monument, they are religious instead "..
worshippers buried Göbekli Tepe under tons of earth...." Most interesting is
the posted video with numerous still images of the site. The math is fuzzy, the
images are clear:
Mesopotamia is located on the fertile flood plain of the Tigris and
Euphrates rivers in a hot desert ecology. Human settlements based on
irrigation agriculture first appeared coincident to the establishment
of Eridu about 7400 BP. A great stepped tower, a ziggurat, which culminated
a series of 20 structures built one upon another during a span of 3500
years evidences Eridu's importance. Public architectural monuments
were the focus of early Mesopotamian community centers. By 6500 BP.
large scale canal systems and many towns with public architecture had
been founded. Eridu was the largest.
The Eridu period was followed by the Uruk, named for
its largest and most impressive city. Settled by 6000 BP, Uruk grew
to a population of 10,000 within a millennia. A significant number
of developments occur in Mesopotamia during the Uruk period, including
increased economic specialization, the introduction of metals, and
use of beasts of burden, the wheel, cart and implements like the plow.
River based exchange networks existed. Uruk's large and impressive
Anu ziggurat was repeatedly enlarged to become Mesopotamia's largest.
During the dynastic period (5600 - 5100 BP.) a dozen
city states evolved coincident with a widespread abandonment of rural
settlement in the region. The population of Uruk rose to about 50,000
people and sprawled to cover 450 hectares, making it the world's first
known urban center. Defensive walls around urban concentrations appeared.
A significant new development during the Dynastic period was clay tablets
with written script dating to 5,400 BP. A developed system with presentation
conventions and 1500 ideographic and pictographic elements evolved.
The Sumerian symbols can be equated with the forms of the earlier token
convention dated to 10,000 BP. Writing facilitated cultural continuity,
community organization and commodity transaction. During this period,
about 5,000 BP., the first recognizable states appeared.
The innovation of irrigation agriculture made possible human settlement
and population expansion in otherwise inhospitable areas. Mesopotamia
exemplifies this emergent phenomena and provides one of the earliest
case studies of a circumscribed marginal ecology being transformed
into a breadbasket supporting large population centers. Only the Nile
river exhibits a parallel situation and parallel developments during
the same epoch. In Mesopotamia the earliest period of occupation by
irrigation based agriculturalists centers on Eridu. Previous agricultural
communities existed in northern Mesopotamia where rainfall adequate
to support crops and domesticated animals occurs. What is unique at
Eridu and other southern Mesopotamian settlements is a dependence on
canal based irrigation, allowing emergent agriculturalists to adapt
to an otherwise inhospitable ecology.
Irrigation did occur elsewhere prior to Eridu's settlement. At Eridu
irrigation is a community scale enterprise. The earliest occupational
levels include significant, central public structures that evolved
to ziggurats. These structures remained central to Mesopotamian communities
and are probably reflective of the evolution of community and regional
organization during a continuum spanning millennia. Their constant
rebuilding and enlargement is indicative of their social significance.
Their centrality in the community is not only spatial; they are surrounded
by important architecture like storage buildings and the most palatial
compounds.
Canal works and public architecture evidence community organization.
Evidence of land control or ownership systems is more ephemeral. Irrigation
works make land more valuable to the agriculturalist or community,
a quality dependent on a capacity to construct, operate and maintain
a spatially complex, elaborate water transport system. This sort of
sophisticated sphere of activity involves foresight, feasibility understanding,
good engineering, organized construction and, to insure continuity,
constant control and maintenance; in other words a community organization
with continuity. Did communities, families or individuals own the land?
The value added dimension of irrigation system construction must have
altered the way humans interrelated with land, particularly regarding
temporality of ownership. Creators tend to view their products as property
and persons and communities in creating extensive canal irrigation
works became property owners. The ever larger central mound surmounted
with community structures as the locus of the community area represents
a form of deed, evidencing the community's longstanding claim to the
locality. Today the ziggurats, tells and canal works remain as evidence
from which the archaeologist works to reconstruct how the complex web
of the first civilization and urban area evolved from a highly successful
adaptation of irrigation agriculture.
The combination of agriculture, complex large scale irrigation works
and community organization was such a successful adaptation that it
sustained 50,000 member urban centers. The massive ziggurats, manifestations
of the community's heritage and enduring temporality, encase many chapters
in the history of the evolution of Sumerian civilization and statehood.
Ziggurats, tells, canals and defensive walls write history for us today
as surely as did the Sumerians evolve to utilize writing, annote our
most ancient histories and thereby begin to close the door on prehistory.
ArchaeoBlog -
An archaeology web log by James Q. Jacobs
Download this deskpicture -
1280 pixel image
The Original ArchaeoBlog
Pages: Mound Builders of the Eastern
Woodlands, Fall 2005
Due to family, friends, and students
requesting images of my journey
to visit major ancient earthworks in the Ohio Valley region, I started
the
ArchaeoBlog with the following photo galleries. Hopefully, the journals
impart a sense of 'being there now AND long before' while read.