| The
Archaeogeodesy Pages ©1997-2008
by James Q. Jacobs |
| Archaeogeodesy is the field of study I
proposed in 1991 upon publishing Site-to-Site Relationships
of Monumental Prehistoric Sites of North America. In 1992,
I wrote Archaeogeodesy, A Key to Prehistory,
discussing basic concepts and presenting study findings to illustrate
fundamental ideas. Rewrittten and enlarged, the online version
is now a series of four articles. Here follows the first paragraph.
"Archaeogeodesy can be
defined as that area of study encompassing prehistoric and
ancient place determination, navigation (on land or water),
point positioning, measure and representation of the earth,
geodynamic phenomena, and the applied astronomy. Archaeogeodesy,
by combining fundamental astronomy, geodetic knowledge, applied
mathematics, accurate positional data and archaeology, presents
a methodology for investigating the architecture, placements,
spatial properties, relationships and arrangements of prehistoric
sites and monuments. As a new area of inquiry, archaeogeodesy
presents unique avenues of assessing ancient understandings
of geography, of place, and of the earth and the cosmos as
evidenced by archaeological remains. "
Since 1992, GPS technology has become readily available and affordable.
Coordinates I once scaled from maps are being refined to near-meter
accuracy. The GPS system also utilizes a global coordinate system.
Previous national systems utilized distinct reference spheres and
required corrections. Current technology has facilitated moving
beyond approximate coordinates and consequent preliminary study
results. Therefore, more findings are now incorporated in these
pages.
Applications with Site Coordinates
If utilizing the software and data I present,
the degree of accuracy inherent in the coordinates must
be considered. Unless coordinates are GPS determined, accuracy
is approximate. Hopefully, distribution of these tools
will stimulate others to acquire GPS coordinates. I welcome
contributions of GPS data, and thank those who have added
to the site data.
|
ArchaeoGeodesy
Arc distances and bearings
for three sites, with mounds, pyramids,
and sites worldwide. |
Neolithic_Calc
Arc distances and bearings
for three sites, with some Neolithic
monuments of northeastern
Europe. |
|
|
| Articles
and References |
| The Geodesy Page presents
definitions, figure of the earth formulas,
and other useful information about geodesy.
Preliminary
Archaeogeodesy Study Results
for Three Major Neolithic Complexes
Thornborough Henges and the Ure-Swale
Monuments
Assessing Evidence of Geospatial Intelligence in the Neolithic
The
Chaco Meridian. Big Horn Medicine Wheel, Mt. Wilson, Aztec
Ruin, Chaco Canyon,
the Mimbres Valley, and Casas Grandes in Northern Mexico are all
situated
on an approximate north-south line near the 108th meridian.
The
Ur and Harran Latitudes, and Göbekli
Tepe
The Archaeoastronomy
Page contains the sources
and bibliography list. |
| Archaeogeodesy
Studies |
- 1991. Study Notes: Site-to-Site Relationships of Monumental
Prehistoric Sites of North America.
- 1992. Study Notes: Site-to-Site Relationships
of Prehistoric Monuments.
- 1992. Archaeogeodesy, a Key to
Prehistory.
- 1993. Archaeogeodesy Study Notes.
- 1993.
ArchaeoGeodesy, the Software.
- 1996. Archaeogeography Studies.
- 1996.
Monks Mound and Secular Polar Motion.
- 1997. First publication
of this web site.
- 2000. The Possible Geodetic Properties
and Relationships of Neolithic Monuments of the British
Isles, Preliminary Results.
- "Longitude is an easier problem to resolve on land
than at sea, and may have been accomplished with a lunar
calendar and astronomic observations over an extended period
of time... ""It is very probable that the builders of Avebury
and the nearby large henges were conscious of their position
on a round earth."
- "... results suggest the possibility that geodetic knowledge
was sufficiently advaned to include the ellipsoidal form
of the earth, determination of longitude, and precise positioning
of monuments in relation to each other across great distances
and on opposite sides of the Irish Sea. Although the amount
of evidence so far revealed is not a resounding affirmation
of this view, enough evidence has been brought to light
to conclude that the possibility deserves further study."
- 2001. Possible Geodetic Properties and Relationships of Some
Monumental Earthworks in the Middle Ohio Valley.
- " The Newark Octagon and Marietta
Square ratio of arc distance to longitude difference,
the azimuth of the Newark Octagon, and the bearings between
Newark Circle and the Octagon Circle infer precise understanding
of the mathematical ratio of latitude to longitude. "
- "I conclude that the builders
of the Middle Ohio earthworks understood aspects of geodesy,
including accurate astronomical knowledge, knowledge
of the scale and shape of the earth, knowledge of their
location on the earth, and how to place find and point
position."
- 2002. Science in Prehispanic Mesoamerica
|
| Web
Hubs by the Author |
| |
|